These Dragons be Draggin’

Fardles, as Sorka Hanrahan, the first Dragonlady, might say.

I just finished Dragon’s Fire, the latest installment in the Pern series, and am less than impressed. In fact, I’m downright disappointed.

The story is so-so to begin with, but what I found on page 194 ruined it for me. I did a double take, flipped back to the beginning of the book, and sure enough, the authors had repeated themselves. Almost word for word.

p. 31

A wing of dragons suddenly appeared in the sky, well below the queens, and moments later the loud booms of their arrival shook the air.

“They look small, ” Cristov said, surprised.

“They’re weyrlings,” the harper said. “They’re just old enough to fly between and carry firestone.”

p.194

A wing of dragons suddenly appeared in the sky, well below the queens, and moments later the loud booms of their arrival shook the air.

“They look small, ” Cristov marveled.

“They’re weyrlings,” Britell replied. “They’re just old enough to fly between and carry firestone.”

Okay, a small cut and paste error–anyone could make one of those. But there was another, larger instance in the same scene.

p. 32

A ripple of overwhelming sound and a burst of cold air announced the arrival of a huge wing of dragons, flying low over the crowd.

“Telgar!” The crowd shouted as the dragons entered a steep dive, twisted into a sharp rolling climb, and came to a halt, their formation intermeshed with the weyrlings so perfectly that it looked like the two wings of dragons had been flying as one, even though the fighting wing was head to head and a meter underneath the weyrlings.

Cristov gasped as a rain of sacks fell from the weyrlings only to be caught by the riders of the great fighting dragons. Looking at the jacket worn by the bronze rider leading the fighting wing, he saw the stylized field of wheat set in a white diamond–it was the Weyrleader himself!

As one, the fighting wing of dragons turned and dove again, flawlessly returning to hover in the same place where it had come from between. As the dragons hovered, their great necks twisted and their heads turned back to face their riders, who opened the sacks they had caught to feed the firestone to their dragons.

“Nasty stuff, firestone,” Cristov heard the harper mutter behind him. “Nasty stuff.”

Then, on page 195:

A ripple of overwhelming sound and a burst of cold air announced the arrival of a huge wing of dragons, flying low over the crowd.

“Telgar!” The crowd shouted as the dragons entered a steep dive, twisted into a sharp rolling climb, and came to a halt, their formation now aligned just below the weyrlings so perfectly that it looked like the two wings of dragons had been flying as twins, even though the fighting wing was head to head and a meter underneath the weyrlings.

A rain of sacks fell from the weyrlings and were caught by the riders of the great fighting dragons. Cristov looked at the jacket worn by the bronze rider leading the fighting wing and gasped when he saw the stylized field of wheat set in a white diamond: It was the Weyrleader himself!

As one, the fighting wing of dragons turned and dove again, flawlessly returning to hover in the same place where it had come from between. The great great necks of the flying beasts turned back and the riders opened the sacks they had caught from the weyrlings to feed the firestone to their dragons.

And a few lines later…

“Nasty stuff, firestone,” Cristov heard the Lord Holder mutter behind him. “Nasty stuff.”

So there were a few minor word changes here and there, but it is quite obviously the same scene being recycled.

Also, on p. 49, we’re told that Ima, Camp Natalon’s hunter, is a woman. But on p. 56, Ima is called “him.”

(and don’t get me started on the fact that Pellar is only 13, albeit a very mature 13, when he experiences his first mating flight.)

Little things, but things that made me feel like neither one of the McCaffreys (or their editor) really cared all that much about the quality of their writing. Sloppy, thrown-together, formulaic–that’s what the Pern stories have become.

I’ve read all the Pern books (except Dragonsblood–Wind Blossom was not a sympathetic character in Dragonsdawn, so I was surprised to see her as a main character in this one). I used to read and reread them, but now I think the series has gone on long enough. The new stories are tired, the characters bland, the writing almost insipid.

Or maybe I’ve just gotten too critical. But that’s another post.

A blurb on the back cover says, “The torch has been passed and burns more brightly than ever…”

That may be true, but I think the torch has passed to Naomi Novik, not Todd McCaffrey.

8 Responses to “These Dragons be Draggin’”

  1. Carla Says:

    A cynic would say there’s no need for the publisher to care about the writing now, since the series is so well established that it will continue to sell through quite a number of poor books until significant numbers of fans give up and go elsewhere. But it seems sad if the writers have given up caring too.

    One way of telling if you’ve become too critical is to reread the earlier stories in the series that you used to love. If they still seem fresh and sparkling even now you know what happens, it’s likely to be the series that’s changed rather than you. If you now see all sorts of flaws and no longer enjoy them, then maybe you’ve got more critical.

  2. Toni Lea Andrews Says:

    As a newbie author at a big publishing house, my stuff is edited to bits. Which is good, I need the input. They’ve done this before. Well.

    I know certain other authors (whom I am waaaay to diplomatic to name) who have become big enough names that they can insist their stuff does not require anything other than line (typos, etc.) editing. I read their books, and I find things that would not get through a first perusal by my critique partners. Recent example: starting three sentences with the same phrase within four paragraphs.

    I aspire to a)being a big enough fish in the pond that I would be able to demand my stuff not be edited and b)being smart/humble enough to never take advantage of that status.

  3. omninaif Says:

    “If they still seem fresh and sparkling even now you know what happens, it’s likely to be the series that’s changed rather than you.” - Carla

    I totally agree with this comment. Anne McCaffrey is a borderline juggernaut when it comes to fan loyality. I would hate to think she’s lost so many of them with the help of her son.

    Nice post/review.

  4. nessili Says:

    My copy of Dragonsdawn was falling apart. The same thing with Dragonriders (the first three in one book) and the Harper series. I finally got rid of them because 1. I didn’t have space on my shelves anymore (I needed the space for the HTF and Out-of-Print books I was scouring eBay and Amazon for), and I knew I could easily find those sets at the library. 2. I had them completely memorized :-)

    Those were wonderful books. I’m sure I’ll go back and check them out at some time. Especially Dragonsdawn–I love colonization books.

    But the later ones? Bah. Can’t even remember them enough to bother keeping them straight.

    Same thing happened with The Rowan series. I’ve read and reread The Rowan and Damia…after those two, the books started to sound the same.

    Maybe I have a problem with series in general. The Amelia Peabody series got to be repetetive too. (I won’t comment on my beloved Trixie Belden, as part of their charm was their sameness)

  5. Carla Says:

    “Part of their charm was their sameness” I think that may be one of the appealing features of series in general. Readers know pretty much what they’re going to get, so it’s a safe bet when faced with a gazillion books to choose from. But at some point knowing what you’re going to get becomes a boring rather than a comforting prospect – and if I could define what made that happen, I’d be shopping for a private island :-)

  6. Ryan Mc. Says:

    You really like dragons huh?

  7. velvet Says:

    yeah, i have necountered a “big named” author with the same mistake.. of repeating herself in a novel. after a few pages the same thought and words was there mixed up in another pharagraph. sometimes she even repeat character names.. but it wasn’t a series. oh well i wont bother to name her tho. best is just move on to explore other books or genre.. that worked for me.

  8. nessili Says:

    I like dragons. I like military history. The Teremaire series is a lovely combination of the two. I like dragons. I like science fiction. The Pern books used to be a great way to get both, though I think I shall be following Velvet’s advice and move on. Alas.

    In general though, I prefer wolves. I just don’t read too many fantasy books about them because I’m trying to write one myself and don’t want to accidentally grab thoughts from other places (or get too depressed that every wolf-related plotline is already been used. That whole “fresh twist” thing is a real pain in the boohickey).